CO129-258 - Governor Sir Robinson - 1893 [1-4] — Page 75

CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案 All AI Reviewed

explanation, especially in view of the fact that such inclusion did not bind the Council to sanctioning any particular amount for extending and improving the Gaol. His appeal however produced no effect on them, and they all voted for the deletion of the item. The motion for deletion was negatived by the official vote, and the third reading similarly carried, the unofficial members voting unanimously against it, including D. Hokar and Mr. Bell-Irving who were otherwise in favour of the Bill but objected equally with their colleagues to the retention of the item of the Gaol in the schedule. On this question of enlarging the Gaol I shall very shortly have the honour of addressing Your Lordship in a separate despatch, and in the meanwhile

Edit History

2026-05-26 21:39:19 · NVIDIA / meta/llama-4-maverick-17b-128e-instruct

Live

View comparison

AI Proofread

8 9 1 explanation, especially in view of the fact that such inclusion did not bind the Council to sanctioning any particular amount for extending and improving the Gaol. His appeal however produced no effect on them, and they all voted for the deletion of the item. The motion for deletion was negatived by the official vote, and the third reading similarly carried, the unofficial members voting unanimously against it, including D. Hokar and Mr. Bell-Irving who were otherwise in favour of the Bill but objected equally with their colleagues to the retention of the item of the Gaol in the schedule. On this question of enlarging the Gaol I shall very shortly have the honour of addressing Your Lordship in a separate despatch, and in the meanwhile

Baseline (Original)

t 8 9 1 į ! $ explanation, especially in view of the fact that such inclusion did not bind the Connoil to sanctioning any particular amount for extending and improving "the Gaol . His appeal however produced no effect on them, · and they all voted for the deletion of the item. The motion for deletion was negatived by the official vote, and the third reading similarly carried, the unofficial WAL 74 unofficial members voting unanimously against it, including D. Hokar and Mr. Bell-Irving Irving who were otherwise in favour of the Bill but objected equally with their colleagues to ~ the retention of the item of the Gaol in the schedule, On this question of enlarging the Gaol I shall very shortly have the honour of addressing Your Lordship in a separate despatch, and in the meanwhile

2026-05-26 21:39:19 · Baseline

View content

explanation, especially

view of the fact that such inclusion did not bind

the Connoil to sanctioning any particular amount for extending and improving "the Gaol . His appeal however produced no effect on them,

· and they all voted for the deletion of the item. The

motion for

deletion was

negatived by the official vote, and the third reading similarly carried, the unofficial

WAL

unofficial members voting unanimously against it, including D. Hokar and Mr. Bell-Irving

Irving who were otherwise in favour of the Bill but objected equally with their colleagues to ~ the retention of the item

of the Gaol in the schedule, On this question of enlarging the Gaol I shall very shortly have the honour of addressing Your Lordship in a separate despatch, and in the

CO129-258 - Governor Sir Robinson - 1893 [1-4] — Page 75

Edit History

Comments

Private Research Note